Steel Structures

Seismic Design for Steel Structures — Part 1: Theoretical Foundations & Design Philosophy

Structural Notes · No. 11 · 15 Aug 2026 · 17 min read

1. Lessons from Northridge 1994

On 17 January 1994 the Northridge earthquake (M 6.7) in Los Angeles shattered the profession's confidence in welded steel moment frames (WSMF).

Before Northridge

  • Welded steel moment frames were regarded as the gold standard for seismic resistance.
  • Beam-to-column connections used CJP welds at the beam flanges.
  • Engineers believed the system had excellent ductile deformation capacity.

After Northridge — the shock

  • Hundreds of beam-to-column connections suffered brittle fracture at the welds.
  • Cracks initiated at the CJP weld of the bottom flange and propagated into the column flange.
  • Many structures were damaged with no sign of ductile deformation — the very thing the design relied on.
#Root causeExplanation
1Low-toughness weld metalE70T-4 electrodes had very low Charpy V-Notch toughness
2Weld backing barsCreated root defects that became crack initiation points
3Stress concentrationPlastic deformation occurred right at the column face — the peak-stress location
4Actual strength above designA36 steel had Fy well above nominal, raising the force delivered into the connection
5Poor quality controlWeld inspection failed to catch latent defects

Why this matters in low-seismicity regions

  • Vietnam sits in a low to moderate seismic zone under TCVN 9386.
  • Yet many industrial projects — plants, pipe racks — are designed to US codes (AISC/ASCE).
  • Understanding this lets you pick a system that is appropriate and economical, avoiding both over-design and unsafe detailing.

2. The capacity design philosophy

Figure 1. Capacity design — separating the yielding elements from the protected ones.
Figure 1. Capacity design — separating the yielding elements from the protected ones.
GroupRoleExamplesRequirement
FuseYields and dissipates energyBeam plastic hinges, EBF link beams, CBF bracesLarge, stable inelastic deformation
ProtectedStays elasticColumns, connections, welds, gusset platesStrength above the ultimate capacity of the fuse

Strong column — weak beam

This is the single most important rule in seismic frame design. Plastic hinges must form in the beams first. If the columns yield first you get a soft-storey collapse mechanism — total failure.

ΣM*pc  ≥  ΣM*pb

ΣM*pc = sum of COLUMN moment capacities at the joint (allowing for axial load)
ΣM*pb = sum of BEAM plastic-hinge moments (using expected strength)

Expected strength and the plastic hinge moment

Real steel always yields above its nominal Fy. When designing a protected element you must use the expected strength of the fuse — otherwise the protected element is not genuinely stronger than the fuse.

Fye = Ry × Fy        (expected yield strength)
Fue = Rt × Fu        (expected tensile strength)

Plastic hinge moment:
  Mpr = Cpr × Ry × Fy × Ze

Cpr = strain-hardening factor, AISC recommends 1.1
Ze  = plastic section modulus at the hinge location

3. The seven seismic systems and their design coefficients

Figure 2. Design coefficients compared across the seismic force-resisting systems.
Figure 2. Design coefficients compared across the seismic force-resisting systems.
SystemRΩ₀CdFuse element
SMF — special moment frame835.5Beam plastic hinge
IMF — intermediate moment frame4.534Beam plastic hinge
OMF — ordinary moment frame3.533Beam plastic hinge
SCBF — special concentrically braced625Braces in tension/compression
OCBF — ordinary concentrically braced3.2523.25Braces
EBF — eccentrically braced824Link beam
BRBF — buckling-restrained braced825BRB core

What the three coefficients mean

  • R — response modification: lets you reduce the design force in exchange for ductility. A higher R means smaller design forces but far stricter detailing. It is a trade, not a gift.
  • Ω₀ — overstrength: amplifies the design force for particular elements (columns, connections, collectors) so they do not fail before the fuse reaches its ultimate capacity.
  • Cd — deflection amplification: elastic analysis gives δxe; the real drift is δx = Cd × δxe / Ie. This is what the drift check uses.

Moment frames — three tiers

SMFIMFOMF
Drift capacity0.04 rad0.02 rad0.02 rad
Strong column – weak beamRequiredRequiredNot required
b/t limitsλhdλmdλp
ConnectionsPrequalified (AISC 358)Tested / qualifiedFlexible
Height limitNoneYesTight
Suitable SDCD, E, FC, DA, B, C

Braced frames — concentric, eccentric and BRBF

  • CBF (concentric): brace axes pass through the joint; energy is dissipated by tension yielding and compression buckling. K-braces are prohibited in both SCBF and OCBF.
  • EBF (eccentric): the brace axis deliberately misses the joint, creating a short link beam. The link yields while the brace and outer beam stay elastic. R = 8 like an SMF but far stiffer.
  • BRBF: the brace is encased so it cannot buckle in compression — it yields symmetrically both ways, dissipating energy very efficiently. Detailing is simpler than SCBF.
Link type (EBF)LengthMechanismRotation capacity
Short link (shear)e ≤ 1.6·Mp/VpShear yieldingγp = 0.08 rad
Intermediate1.6 < e/(Mp/Vp) < 2.6CombinedInterpolate
Long link (flexural)e ≥ 2.6·Mp/VpFlexural yieldingγp = 0.02 rad

4. Determining the design seismic force

The six ASCE 7 steps

1. Read the seismic maps → Ss (0.2s period) and S1 (1.0s period)

2. Site coefficients for Site Class A→F:
     SMS = Fa × Ss          SM1 = Fv × S1

3. Design spectral accelerations:
     SDS = 2/3 × SMS        SD1 = 2/3 × SM1

4. Seismic Design Category (SDC) from SDS, SD1 and Risk Category

5. Seismic response coefficient:
     Cs = SDS / (R / Ie)
     not more than  SD1 / [ T × (R / Ie) ]     when T ≤ TL
     not less than  0.044 × SDS × Ie  ≥  0.01

6. Base shear:
     V = Cs × W            W = total effective seismic weight

ASCE 7 versus TCVN 9386

FeatureASCE 7 (US)TCVN 9386 / EC8
Primary parameterSs, S1 (spectral acceleration)agR (peak ground acceleration)
Design spectrumFrom SDS, SD1Elastic spectrum × 1/q
Force reductionRq (behaviour factor)
Return period2,475 years (MCE) then ×2/3475 years
ZoningUSGS mapsProvince-level maps

The Vietnamese context

  • agR ranges from 0.0432g in the quietest zones to 0.1086g in Điện Biên and Lai Châu.
  • Most of the country sits below agR = 0.08g — low to very low seismicity.
  • Foreign-invested projects usually demand US codes, so a PGA-to-ASCE conversion is needed.
Rough conversion:  SDS ≈ 2/3 × Fa × (2.5 × agR)

  agR = 0.08g, Site Class D  →  SDS ≈ 0.21g  →  SDC B
                                 OMF or OCBF is acceptable

  agR > 0.10g, Site Class D  →  SDS ≈ 0.27g  →  SDC C
                                 IMF or SCBF and above required

The drift check

δx = Cd × δxe / Ie

Limits by Risk Category:
  I, II  →  0.020 × hsx
  III    →  0.015 × hsx
  IV     →  0.010 × hsx      (hsx = storey height)
Figure 3. Drift angle and the formation of the plastic hinge.
Figure 3. Drift angle and the formation of the plastic hinge.

5. Material requirements — why A36 is the wrong steel

Mass-produced steel typically yields 20–50% above its nominal value. A36 is nominally Fy = 248 MPa but routinely tests at 300–380 MPa.

Steel gradeFy (MPa)RyRt
ASTM A362481.51.2
ASTM A572 Gr.503451.11.1
ASTM A9923451.11.1
ASTM A500 Gr.B (HSS)3171.41.3
ASTM A500 Gr.C (HSS)3451.31.2
ASTM A913 Gr.50/S753451.11.1

When to use Ry × Fy and when to use nominal Fy

Use expected strength Ry × FyUse nominal Fy
Computing the plastic hinge moment MprDesigning the fuse element itself
Designing connections that receive fuse forcesOrdinary capacity-ratio checks
The strong column – weak beam check
Designing CBF gusset plates

CVN toughness

  • Demand-critical welds must achieve CVN ≥ 27J at −29°C.
  • Use high-toughness filler metal — low-toughness electrodes were what caused Northridge.
  • Remove the backing bar after CJP welding at the bottom beam flange.

6. Width-to-thickness limits

Under large inelastic strains the flange or web can buckle locally. Early buckling means losing capacity before any energy is absorbed — precisely what seismic design depends on. Hence seismic elements need tighter b/t ratios than ordinary design.

LevelSymbolApplies to
Highly ductileλhdSMF beams, SCBF braces, EBF links
Moderately ductileλmdIMF beams, SCBF columns
CompactλpOMF and ordinary design
FLANGE (unstiffened element)
  I-shape:   λhd = 0.32·√(E/Fy)    λmd = 0.40·√(E/Fy)    λp = 0.38·√(E/Fy)
  HSS    :   λhd = 0.65·√(E/Fy)    λmd = 0.76·√(E/Fy)    λp = 1.12·√(E/Fy)

WEB (stiffened element)
  Flexure  :  λhd = 2.57·√(E/Fy)   λmd = 3.76·√(E/Fy)
  Combined :  λhd = 1.57·√(E/Fy)
  HSS wall :  λhd = 0.65·√(E/Fy)   λmd = 0.76·√(E/Fy)

Actual numbers for Fy = 345 MPa

Elementλhdλmdλp
I-shape flange (bf/2tf)7.709.639.15
Web in flexure (h/tw)61.890.5

Two sections checked

W21×62  (Fy = 345 MPa)
  bf/2tf = 7.53   ≤  λhd = 7.70   →  OK for SMF
  h/tw   = 46.9   ≤  λhd = 61.8   →  OK for SMF

W14×48  (Fy = 345 MPa)
  bf/2tf = 6.75   ≤  λhd = 7.70   →  OK for SMF
  h/tw   = 33.6   ≤  λhd = 61.8   →  OK for SMF

7. Part 1 summary

TopicKey point
NorthridgeBrittle weld fracture rewrote the entire design philosophy
Capacity designPre-select the fuse, then make everything else stronger than it
Strong column – weak beamΣM*pc ≥ ΣM*pb, using Ry × Fy
R, Ω₀, CdR cuts force, Ω₀ amplifies locally, Cd amplifies drift
SystemsSMF/EBF/BRBF at R = 8, SCBF at 6, OMF at 3.5
MaterialUse A992 (Ry = 1.1), avoid A36 (Ry = 1.5)
b/tλhd for SMF/SCBF/EBF, λmd for IMF, λp for OMF
VietnamMostly agR < 0.08g → SDC B–C → OMF/OCBF usually suffices

References: FEMA 350 · AISC 341-22 · ASCE 7-22 · AISC 358-22 · TCVN 9386:2012. Part of the “Industrial structural design guide” series by Roberto Structural. The content is technical guidance only; the engineer remains responsible for verifying and adapting it to each project and the governing code.

Share this article
View all articles